Monday, December 2, 2013

Assault in Academia: My Meeting at RCA, Part 1

R3 Editor

Click here for the other installments of this series

I was looking forward to attending the National Communication Association (NCA) conference this year in Washington, DC. Truthfully, I look forward to the conference every year because it is my chance to see so many of my friends that I only get to see at conference time. I also like to attend the panels and hear exciting and thought provoking research that lead to the many "panel after the panel" sessions and evening conversations over dinner. Since I started attending NCA—first as a graduate student at the University of Memphis and now as an Associate Professor at Memphis Theological Seminary, I have found my times there thoroughly enjoyable. Not that there has not been a problem or two, but the friendships and fellowships outweighed any problem that may have occurred.

While I always look forward to attending NCA, there were two additional reasons for my excitement this year. First, the African American Communication and Culture Division (AACCD) of NCA awarded me its Outstanding Book Award for 2013. When I heard this news just a couple of weeks before the conference, I was truly thankful and humbled that my peers thought that my work, The Forgotten Prophet: Bishop Henry McNeal Turner and the African American Prophetic Tradition warranted such a distinction. Reflecting over the years that I have worked examining Bishop Turner, the hours I spent reading material, finishing the dissertation and hammering out the book, I stopped what I was doing at the time, prayed, thanked God and smiled when thinking that my book would now include the moniker “Award Winning.”

Second, along with winning the Outstanding Book Award for the AACCD, the Religious Communication Association (RCA) also nominated me to serve as their Second Vice President. Again, I was truly humbled and shocked to receive an email asking me would I serve. Truthfully, I did not know that members of the group thought that highly of me. I had submitted papers, served as a reviewer and respondent, chaired panels, presented at a couple of preconferences, and received their Article of the Year Award in 2011 for my article The Prophetic Persona of James Cone and the Rhetorical Construction of Black Theology. I never however, imagined serving in a leadership capacity—especially in one that leads to the presidency of the group. RCA, while not a division of NCA, nonetheless, still have their panels and meetings integrated into the overall program of NCA and many members who are in RCA are members of NCA as well. Therefore, I thought this was a good fit.

However, a funny thing happened while walking to the meeting. I began to discern that I should withdraw my name from consideration. I did not know why I should do this because of my earlier excitement about my nomination. Why withdraw now? Would it look as if I did not want to be a part or did not want to serve the organization? I shared this "feeling" with two friends, who walked to the meeting with me and after some discussion back and forth, I knew that I was going to withdraw my name from consideration.

Then I met Dr. Denise Ferguson. We met before the meeting started and talked about the position, because unknown to me, someone had nominated Dr. Ferguson for the position of Second VP as well. As we talked and shared, I learned she had been with the organization longer than I had, and served in several different capacities—including the Executive Council. In short, I felt that Dr. Ferguson had put the time in the organization, knew the ins and outs of the group and she was willing to serve. I knew then that I would withdraw my name from consideration—thinking that my time would come next year or the year after. I understood why I had those feelings of withdrawing my name while walking over to the meeting—it was Dr. Denise Ferguson’s time to serve. I was happy about the decision and about what I was going to do when it was my time to speak.

When it came time for the election, we both had to give a brief speech supporting our candidacies. Dr. Ferguson spoke first and she might as well have served as my campaign manager! Her speech highlighted why I would be the better candidate. Her speech focused on what she believed I would bring to RCA—namely the diversity in both my person and scholarship. She told the members of the group that I would make a great Second VP and it would be good to have me in leadership. In other words, stopping short of withdrawing her name, (in the end, she was still willing to serve) she ask members to seriously support me for the position. Whether campaign strategy or not, she struck a chord with the members who found her speech to be gracious and an example of humility.

When it was my turn to speak, all I had to do was to accept her recommendation to the body—to support me. However, when I got up to speak I knew what I had to do—withdraw my name and allow Dr. Ferguson to serve as our Second VP. After all, I felt I needed to do this. Therefore, as magnanimous as I could with an extemporaneous speech, I said something on the line of this:

I am humbled and truly grateful for your nomination of me for the position of Second VP. When I receive the email asking would I be willing to serve if nominated and elected, I saw this as an affirmation of my scholarship, my previous service and frankly, me as a person. Truly, I am honored that you would think of me for this position—a position that leads to the presidency of this wonderful organization. For you to nominate me—again, I am thankful and humbled.
However, Dr. Denise Ferguson is also up for this position, I got a chance to meet her before the meeting started, and I think she would make an excellent Second VP. Therefore, I am withdrawing my name from consideration and call upon all of us to support Dr. Denise Ferguson for Second VP.

I did it—I withdrew my name from consideration and threw my support behind Dr. Ferguson. After some discussion about my sincerity in withdrawing my name, members finally understood that I was withdrawing my name and did not want to run. I even mentioned in my speech that I could run next year or the year after, that I was not going anywhere and felt real good about my decision.

After more discussion, the committee finally passed out ballots for our election. There was one other competitive race on the ballot—that for Councilor. However, right before we were to vote, another member again asked about my withdrawing my name from consideration. As committee members passed out ballots, one member asked was there a way that both of us could serve because we were so gracious to each other and very rarely do you see such a gracious response from two people running against one another.

After I restated my position of withdrawing my name again, it happened. Something happened that I could not believe; something happened that shocked me and others who sat near me, something happened that tested who I was or at least thought I was; something happen that I would never ever forget. After I made the statement, “Again, with apologies to the chair and the board, I withdraw my name from consideration,” it happened. I was smack upside my head!! Yes, you read correctly—on Friday November 22, 2013, someone assaulted me, Dr. Andre E. Johnson, in an open business meeting of the Religious Communication Association at the 99th Annual Convention of the National Communication Association.

To Be Continued……

Follow Andre on Twitter @aejohnsonphd
Follow R3 on Twitter @examinereligion


Kimberley TheIntelligenthoodlum Travers said...

WOW!!! Behavior of this magnitude is not tolerated ANYWHERE, but especially at an open business meeting of the Religious Communications Association; in academia for that matter. We are taught as children to KEEP OUR HANDS TO OURSELVES. The incident could have spiraled into something else with a different conclusion. This is disruptive on SO MANY LEVELS!!!!! This type of behavior is despicable and the man should be dealt with accordingly. There should be CONSEQUENCES AND REPERCUSSIONS for 'THE MAN' who assaulted you. I want to commend you Dr. Johnson on how you handled the shows what caliber of man you are. This individual will get his JUST DESERTS in due time. The PEN is MIGHTIER than the sword!!!!

Anonymous said...

Congratulations and keep up the good work!

Dr. Lou

Craig Stewart said...

Sandy told me about this the other day. I can't wait to see the rest of the story!

Anonymous said...

I am sorry this happened to you during NCA. I will save sharing my full opinion in this comments section until all of the facts are revealed. Because I believe Smacks are often contextual and can be placed on a continuum ranging from; love taps, to down right physical abuse. I do however wonder, upon reflection if you would comment to your thoughts on why this other person felt they had the authority to put their hands on you in what I would consider to be a disrespectful manner? Did they misread your kindness or humility as weakness? Were they trying to offer some sort of punishment for your decision and if so why? I may be reading more into this and I'm sure I am projecting but this type of physical contact is made even more disturbing when you consider race and gender. I will hold any further comments on this matter until I have a chance to read the next blog. But I would like to applaud you on your honesty and bravery for publishing your reflections on this event.

Koritha Mitchell said...

Oh, my.

mobile services said...

Wonderful blog & good post.Its really helpful for me, awaiting for more new post. Keep Blogging!

Mobile Phone Conference